Thank you: the R Language Definition is very helpful.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 3:18 PM Abby Spurdle wrote:
> Do you just need something on pen and paper?
> (In which case, I don't see why it needs to be "standard").
>
> Or do you need something that can be used with bison/yacc/cup/etc to
> produce
On 06/01/2020 5:19 p.m., neonira Arinoem wrote:
@steve
Seek for online document named "writing R extensions" chapter 2. It tells
You hardly need to look for it online: it is included with every copy
of R. Just run help.start() in R (or look in the menus for the GUI
versions).
Duncan Murd
@steve
Seek for online document named "writing R extensions" chapter 2. It tells
how to describe a list structure using item markup for R documentation
files, if indeed this matches your search, thing I am not sure. Something
that looks like...
value{
The \\code{list} owns following names
\\item{
Do you just need something on pen and paper?
(In which case, I don't see why it needs to be "standard").
Or do you need something that can be used with bison/yacc/cup/etc to
produce a parser?
On a side note, I would say that the R Language Definition is the
"standard" way.
But I do recognize that
I need to write some documentation:
I'm looking for a standard, consistent way of referring to the components
and attributes of R data structures. Googling and Stackoverflow yield a
variety of github sites that do not seem to be particularly authoritative.
I was hoping to find a BNF/ABNF gramm