2
>> [2,] 5 5
>>
>>
>> Bill Dunlap
>> Spotfire, TIBCO Software
>> wdunlap tibco.com
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
>>> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of
4 4
>>
>> $B
>> Matrix Named
>> [1,] 2 2
>> [2,] 5 5
>>
>>
>> Bill Dunlap
>> Spotfire, TIBCO Software
>> wdunlap tibco.com
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: r-deve
5
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of
pengyu...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 2:10 PM
To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
Cc: r-b...@r-project.org
Subj
r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of
> pengyu...@gmail.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 2:10 PM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Cc: r-b...@r-project.org
> Subject: [Rd] split() is slow on data.frame (PR#14123)
>
> Please se
Please see the following code for the runtime comparison between
split() and mysplit.data.frame() (they do the same thing
semantically). mysplit.data.frame() is a fix of split() in term of
performance. Could somebody include this fix (with possible checking
for corner cases) in future version of R
