Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-14 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Dec 14, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Fri, 14/12/12, Uwe Ligges wrote: > >> On 14.12.2012 04:15, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: >>> --- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel >> wrote: >>> >>> Do you REALLY think svn would not know about >> missing files? There does not >>

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-14 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Fri, 14/12/12, Uwe Ligges wrote: > On 14.12.2012 04:15, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > --- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel > wrote: > > > > > >> Do you REALLY think svn would not know about > missing > >> files?  There does not > >> seem to be a limit on the disdain for svn among git > user

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 14.12.2012 04:15, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: --- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Do you REALLY think svn would not know about missing files? There does not seem to be a limit on the disdain for svn among git users. Fascinating. FWIW, as one of the linux kernel maintainers, I don't

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-13 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Do you REALLY think svn would not know about missing > files?  There does not > seem to be a limit on the disdain for svn among git users. > Fascinating. FWIW, as one of the linux kernel maintainers, I don't apologize for being familiar with git.

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-10 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Mon, 10/12/12, Martin Maechler wrote: > > Hin-Tak Leung > > >     on Mon, 10 Dec > 2012 09:23:14 + writes: > >     > --- On Mon, 10/12/12, Martin Maechler > > wrote: > [.] > >     >> > That said ..a small bug was > introduced back in >     >> May  . >     >> >    

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-10 Thread Martin Maechler
> Hin-Tak Leung > on Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:23:14 + writes: > --- On Mon, 10/12/12, Martin Maechler wrote: [.] >> > That said ..a small bug was introduced back in >> May  . >> >> Yes, you are right. >> BTW: The reason that nobody (from R core, prob

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-10 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Mon, 10/12/12, Martin Maechler wrote: > > --- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk > Eddelbuettel > wrote: > > > On 9 December 2012 at 18:17, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > | Noticed a problem for a while - tests/testit.Rd, > > tests/ver20.Rd are removed on "make clean" > unintentionally. > > | > > | This s

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-10 Thread Martin Maechler
> --- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 December 2012 at 18:17, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > | Noticed a problem for a while - tests/testit.Rd, > tests/ver20.Rd are removed on "make clean" unintentionally. > | > | This seems to come from a change in tests/Makefile.in, which adds the lin

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-09 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Sun, 9/12/12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 December 2012 at 18:17, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > | Noticed a problem for a while - tests/testit.Rd, > tests/ver20.Rd are removed on "make clean" unintentionally. > | > | This seems to come from a change in tests/Makefile.in, > which adds the lin

Re: [Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 December 2012 at 18:17, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: | Noticed a problem for a while - tests/testit.Rd, tests/ver20.Rd are removed on "make clean" unintentionally. | | This seems to come from a change in tests/Makefile.in, which adds the line: |-@rm -f *.tar.gz *.Rd back in May 2012. | | -

[Rd] small issue with over-zealous clean.

2012-12-09 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
Noticed a problem for a while - tests/testit.Rd, tests/ver20.Rd are removed on "make clean" unintentionally. This seems to come from a change in tests/Makefile.in, which adds the line: -@rm -f *.tar.gz *.Rd back in May 2012. --- commit c4d70254e7b7f9d7ed17faecfb3097195d852ddc Author: