On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:07 PM SOEIRO Thomas wrote:
>
> Dear Deepayan,
>
> I do not have further suggestions, but I just wanted to thank you for taking
> the time to
> improve the documentation so much! (and for adding support for specifying
> "varying" as
> a vector)
>
> Both "Typical usage" a
Dear Deepayan,
I do not have further suggestions, but I just wanted to thank you for taking
the time to improve the documentation so much! (and for adding support for
specifying "varying" as a vector)
Both "Typical usage" and the details are useful additions. Adding a vignette
also seems an ex
One thing about varying is that reshape ignores the names on the
varying list and makes you
specify them all over again even though it could know what they are.
Note that we had to
specify that names(varying) is the v.names.
DF <- structure(list(A1 = 10L, A2 = 5L, B1 = 11L, B2 = 5L, C1 = 21L,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:55 PM Michael Dewey wrote:
>
> Comments in line
>
> On 13/03/2021 09:50, SOEIRO Thomas wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I have some questions/suggestions about reshape.
> >
> > 1) I think a good amount of the popularity of base::reshape alternative is
> > due to the complex
Comments in line
On 13/03/2021 09:50, SOEIRO Thomas wrote:
Dear list,
I have some questions/suggestions about reshape.
1) I think a good amount of the popularity of base::reshape alternative is due to the complexity of
reshape documentation. It is quite hard (at least it is for me) to figure
Dear list,
I have some questions/suggestions about reshape.
1) I think a good amount of the popularity of base::reshape alternative is due
to the complexity of reshape documentation. It is quite hard (at least it is
for me) to figure out what argument is needed for respectively "long to wide"
