On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:21 -0500, Sarah Goslee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm one of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology list, and I think
> it would be entirely appropriate to include hydrology within
> the scope of the list.
I also agree. It was always the intention AFAICR for the R-SIG-Ecology
list
On 16/02/12 12:51, Sarah Goslee wrote:
Dear Martin,
Thank you for confirming what I'd already suspected
about the mailing list software.
What a pity that is not possible, but thank you very much Martin for
confirming and explaining why is not possible.
I've added hydrology explicitly to t
Dear Martin,
Thank you for confirming what I'd already suspected
about the mailing list software.
I've added hydrology explicitly to the list description, and
hope that the hydrologists find it a welcoming home. We've
got a solid core of participants, so R users should
find it a useful resource.
Hi,
I'm the "site maintainer" of the r-sig-...@r-project.org mailing
lists (and back from vacations).
> Sarah Goslee
> on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:16:01 -0500 writes:
> Hi all,
>> It would be great if Sara of someone of the maintainers
>> of the r-sig-ecology list could add t
Hi all,
> It would be great if Sara of someone of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology
> list could add that info to the info page.
I'm talking with the other maintainer about revising both the short and
the long descriptions.
> I think that r-sig-env would be much more intuitive for environment
On 15/02/12 09:07, Dominik Reusser wrote:
Dear all,
I do think that joining efforts is a good idea. However, hydrologists will
probably not intuitively think about joining r-sig-ecology to discuss
hydrological issues. Could we therefore explicitely state on the infopage that
discussions to hydrol
> mauricio.zambr...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
> Cc:
> Dominik Reusser , r-devel@r-project.org,
> w.buyta...@imperial.ac.uk
> Date:
> 02/14/2012 11:24 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [Rd] requesting a new SIG mailing list
> Sent by:
> r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
>
>
>
&
t:
Re: [Rd] requesting a new SIG mailing list
Sent by:
r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
Hello,
I'm one of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology list, and I think
it would be entirely appropriate to include hydrology within
the scope of the list.
There hasn't been much hydrologic discussion, a
Hello,
I'm one of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology list, and I think
it would be entirely appropriate to include hydrology within
the scope of the list.
There hasn't been much hydrologic discussion, as you noted,
but not because we wish to exclude it.
Sarah
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 AM,
On 14/02/12 17:45, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
Have you asked the maintainers of those lists? Or the person who would
have to do the work to set the list up (Martin Maechler, who is
currently on vacation, or colleagues at ETHZ)?
No, I haven't done yet, but I'll do it, to know which list is the rig
Have you asked the maintainers of those lists? Or the person who would
have to do the work to set the list up (Martin Maechler, who is
currently on vacation, or colleagues at ETHZ)?
My suspicion is that there would be too little traffic to make a
separate list worthwhile to administer. (You
On 14/02/12 09:36, Rainer M Krug wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/12 17:30, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
Dear R developers,
Due to the increasing use R in hydrology and other close-related
environmental sciences, I would like to ask if it would be possible
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/02/12 17:30, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
> Dear R developers,
>
> Due to the increasing use R in hydrology and other close-related
> environmental sciences, I would like to ask if it would be possible
> to create a new Special Interest G
Dear R developers,
Due to the increasing use R in hydrology and other close-related
environmental sciences, I would like to ask if it would be possible to
create a new Special Interest Group mailing list, called 'R-sig-hydro',
specially devoted those topics. If possible to do so, I'd offer mys
14 matches
Mail list logo
