On Wed, 17 May 2006, Michael Dondrup wrote:
> Thank you very much, Thomas!
>
> Thanks to the explanation, I think I could almost track down that bug. May I,
> just for clarification, ask a further bunch of questions (sorry). From what
> you say, did I get it right:
>
> - 'error in unprotect: stac
Thank you very much, Thomas!
Thanks to the explanation, I think I could almost track down that bug. May I,
just for clarification, ask a further bunch of questions (sorry). From what
you say, did I get it right:
- 'error in unprotect: stack imbalance' is only a warning, it will not cause
ter
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Michael Dondrup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im currently trying to debug a 'error in unprotect: stack imbalance' problem
> and I am curious about two basic questions on the use of PROTECT and
> UNPROTECT, which I could not figure out:
>
> - which objects have to be protected, namely, if
Hi,
Im currently trying to debug a 'error in unprotect: stack imbalance' problem
and I am curious about two basic questions on the use of PROTECT and
UNPROTECT, which I could not figure out:
- which objects have to be protected, namely, if the code is something like:
SEXP fun, e;
/* get the ex
