> "MM" == Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:52:55 +0100 writes:
> "ken" == ken knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:43:28 +0100 writes:
ken> Actually, since NaN's are also detected in na.action
ken> operations, a simpler
> "ken" == ken knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:43:28 +0100 writes:
ken> Actually, since NaN's are also detected in na.action
ken> operations, a simpler fix might just be to use the
ken> na.rm = TRUE option of min
ken> upper <- min(n^k/(c^(k - 1))
Actually, since NaN's are also detected in na.action operations, a
simpler fix
might just be to use the na.rm = TRUE option of min
upper <- min(n^k/(c^(k - 1)), 1, na.rm = TRUE)
> Recent news articles concerning an article from The Lancet with
> fabricated
> data indicate
> that in the sample
Recent news articles concerning an article from The Lancet with fabricated
data indicate
that in the sample containing some 900 or so patients, more than 200 had
the same
birthday. I was curious and tried out the p and q birthday functions but
pbirthday
could not handle 250 coincidences with n = 1
