Re: [Rd] problem getting R 2.3.1 svn r38481 to pass make check-all

2006-07-05 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 09:49 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > By `R 2.3.1 svn r38481' do you mean R-patched? (R 2.3.1 is released.) Yes, sorry, I meant R-patched svn r38481. My only excuse is jetlag... > > Looks like r38469 ported the revised test results but not the test: I have > now done so

Re: [Rd] problem getting R 2.3.1 svn r38481 to pass make check-all

2006-07-05 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
By `R 2.3.1 svn r38481' do you mean R-patched? (R 2.3.1 is released.) Looks like r38469 ported the revised test results but not the test: I have now done so. On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Gavin Simpson wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed this problem on my home desktop running FC4 and again on my > laptop runni

[Rd] problem getting R 2.3.1 svn r38481 to pass make check-all

2006-07-04 Thread Gavin Simpson
Hi, I noticed this problem on my home desktop running FC4 and again on my laptop running FC5. Both have previously compiled and passed make check-all on 2.3.1 svn revisions from 10 days ago or so. On both these machines, make check-all is consistently failing (4 out of 4 attempts on the FC 4 deskt