> Kasper Daniel Hansen
> on Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:51:55 -0500 writes:
> Gabe, I don't (yet) know much about long vectors at the C level. So feel
> free to address this.
> Duncan, I'll see what I can do regarding systematically compiling a list
of
> functions without lo
Gabe, I don't (yet) know much about long vectors at the C level. So feel
free to address this.
Duncan, I'll see what I can do regarding systematically compiling a list of
functions without long vector support. These days I frequently work with
big enough matrices that I need it.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2
Kasper,
If you're not interested or dont have time to create said patch yourself
let me know and i can do it.
Best,
~G
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 11:36 AM Duncan Murdoch On 21/01/2019 12:35 p.m., Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> > I see that base::pmax() does not support long vectors.
> >
> > Is R-deve
On 21/01/2019 12:35 p.m., Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
I see that base::pmax() does not support long vectors.
Is R-devel interested in reports like this; ie. is there a goal of full
support for long vectors in "basic" functions, something I at least would
greatly appreciate?
MRE:
pmax(rep(1L,
I see that base::pmax() does not support long vectors.
Is R-devel interested in reports like this; ie. is there a goal of full
support for long vectors in "basic" functions, something I at least would
greatly appreciate?
MRE:
> pmax(rep(1L, 3*10^9), 0)
Error in pmax(rep(1L, 3 * 10^9), 0) :
lo
