On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Romain Francois wrote:
Le 11.04.2006 14:12, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit :
That's an interesting suggestion, but
1) it is not a good idea to change the order of arguments in a function.
Yes, my mystake. It's because i like to call 'history(something)' directly
and not 'histo
Le 11.04.2006 14:12, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit :
> That's an interesting suggestion, but
>
> 1) it is not a good idea to change the order of arguments in a function.
Yes, my mystake. It's because i like to call 'history(something)'
directly and not 'history(pattern=something)'.
I hadn't in mind th
That's an interesting suggestion, but
1) it is not a good idea to change the order of arguments in a function.
2) is the 'unique' argument useful? I cannot see it being used if
there is no pattern search, nor I do see the merit in showing repeated
lines if I have subselected.
3) like ls(), tes
Hi,
Sometimes I need to consult the history of commands that are matching a
regex, so I modified the utils::history function for that purpose. I
found it useful.
I append the code ( I only added the two lines with #**)
Romain.
history2 <-
function (pattern="", max.show = 25, reverse = FALSE,
