Re: [Rd] modifying some package code

2012-05-24 Thread Simon Urbanek
On May 24, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Charles Determan Jr wrote: > Simon, > > Thank you for this valuable information. However, you must forgive some > ignorance on my part. If R-registerRoutines defines the native function, how > should I go about fixing this issue? Would I copy the init.c to the ba

Re: [Rd] modifying some package code

2012-05-24 Thread Charles Determan Jr
Simon, Thank you for this valuable information. However, you must forgive some ignorance on my part. If R-registerRoutines defines the native function, how should I go about fixing this issue? Would I copy the init.c to the base package (where I have the new function)? Thanks, Charles On Thu,

Re: [Rd] modifying some package code

2012-05-24 Thread Simon Urbanek
On May 24, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Charles Determan Jr wrote: > Greetings, > > I am working on modifying some code from the nlme package. I have had many > discussions on the mixed models mailing list and have been directed to > simply 'hack' the source code to have the degrees of freedom generated

[Rd] modifying some package code

2012-05-24 Thread Charles Determan Jr
Greetings, I am working on modifying some code from the nlme package. I have had many discussions on the mixed models mailing list and have been directed to simply 'hack' the source code to have the degrees of freedom generated by one function to use in the output of another function that doesn't