On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Hervé Pagès wrote:
I get this (with R-2.12 and R-2.13, didn't try with earlier versions):
max(c(NaN, NA))
[1] NA
max(c(NA, NaN))
[1] NaN
I get the same thing with min().
The fact that the result of 'max(x)' or 'min(x)' depends on the order
of the elements in 'x' is su
I get this (with R-2.12 and R-2.13, didn't try with earlier versions):
> max(c(NaN, NA))
[1] NA
> max(c(NA, NaN))
[1] NaN
I get the same thing with min().
The fact that the result of 'max(x)' or 'min(x)' depends on the order
of the elements in 'x' is surprising. It also seems to contradict the
