undo after the merge.
Stephanie Gogarten
Research Scientist, Biostatistics
University of Washington
On 3/19/12 4:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:48:30 -0400
From: Steve Lianoglou
To: Uwe Ligges
Cc: Matthew Dowle,r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R
sity of Washington
On 3/19/12 4:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
Message: 12
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:48:30 -0400
From: Steve Lianoglou
To: Uwe Ligges
Cc: Matthew Dowle,r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] merge bug fix in R 2.15.0
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; ch
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Steve Lianoglou <
mailinglist.honey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure I follow ... I think we're in total agreement, but it
> sounds like you're suggesting we aren't.
>
I think we are in agreement. I misread your "exhibit B" on the first go and
missed th
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Steve Lianoglou <
mailinglist.honey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> 2012/3/17 Uwe Ligges :
> >
> >
> > On 15.03.2012 22:48, Matthew Dowle wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone?
> >>
> >>> Is it intended that the first suffix can no longer be blank? Seems to
> be
> >>> c
Hi,
I'm not sure I follow ... I think we're in total agreement, but it
sounds like you're suggesting we aren't.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Peter Meilstrup
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Steve Lianoglou
> wrote:
[snip]
>> > Right, the user is now protected against confusing hi
Hi Uwe,
2012/3/17 Uwe Ligges :
>
>
> On 15.03.2012 22:48, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anyone?
>>
>>> Is it intended that the first suffix can no longer be blank? Seems to be
>>> caused by a bug fix to merge in R 2.15.0.
>
>
>
> Right, the user is now protected against confusing himself by using
On 15.03.2012 22:48, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Anyone?
Is it intended that the first suffix can no longer be blank? Seems to be
caused by a bug fix to merge in R 2.15.0.
Right, the user is now protected against confusing himself by using
names that were not unique before the merge.
Uwe Ligg
Anyone?
> Is it intended that the first suffix can no longer be blank? Seems to be
> caused by a bug fix to merge in R 2.15.0.
>
> $Rdevel --vanilla
> DF1 = data.frame(a=1:3,b=4:6)
> DF2 = data.frame(a=1:3,b=7:9)
> merge(DF1,DF2,by="a",suffixes=c("",".1"))
> Error in merge.data.frame(DF1, DF2, by
Is it intended that the first suffix can no longer be blank? Seems to be
caused by a bug fix to merge in R 2.15.0.
$Rdevel --vanilla
DF1 = data.frame(a=1:3,b=4:6)
DF2 = data.frame(a=1:3,b=7:9)
merge(DF1,DF2,by="a",suffixes=c("",".1"))
Error in merge.data.frame(DF1, DF2, by = "a", suffixes = c("",
