On 20 September 2014 at 19:55, Harris A. Jaffee wrote:
| Terrific, and I appreciate your thoughts and encouragement.
|
| So, getting back on-list, I propose a backward-incompatible change, with
| or without --verbose, that the --args be included in the 'av' array, and
| passed to R, only if there
Terrific, and I appreciate your thoughts and encouragement.
So, getting back on-list, I propose a backward-incompatible change, with
or without --verbose, that the --args be included in the 'av' array, and
passed to R, only if there are user arguments to follow it. The condition
for a first argum
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Harris A Jaffee
>> on Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:32:29 +0200 writes:
>
> (using HTML, please don't )
>
>> The loop that echoes the arguments almost always stops too soon. It
>> apparently does that to avoid
>> echoing t
> Harris A Jaffee
> on Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:32:29 +0200 writes:
(using HTML, please don't )
> The loop that echoes the arguments almost always stops too soon. It
> apparently does that to avoid
> echoing the "--args" (that had been inserted) when there are no user
> argu
The loop that echoes the arguments almost always stops too soon. It apparently
does that to avoid
echoing the "--args" (that had been inserted) when there are no user arguments.
However, when there
are user arguments, the next element of the 'av' array is the last argument and
usually not "--a
