Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > This should now be fixed in R-devel, and shortly in the 2.15.0 beta. Thanks very much. Dan > > Duncan Murdoch > > > On 12-03-20 2:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
This should now be fixed in R-devel, and shortly in the 2.15.0 beta. Duncan Murdoch On 12-03-20 2:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12-03-20 1:46 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 1

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 12-03-20 1:46 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch    wrote: >

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12-03-20 1:46 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: Hello, Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wo

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: Hello, Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if a

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12-03-20 1:25 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: Hello, Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at this. No. Could you put together a simple self contained example?

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at >> this. > > > No.  Could you put together a simple self contained example?  I don't have > any BioC pac

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12-03-19 10:27 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: Hello, Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at this. No. Could you put together a simple self contained example? I don't have any BioC packages installed. Alternatively, you could take a look at the .tex files ge

Re: [Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-19 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
Hello, Sorry to repeat myself, but I was wondering if anyone had taken a look at this. Because of this problem, reference manuals are not being created for many Bioconductor packages (any package where there is a \Sexpr in an .Rd file). Thanks in advance--we appreciate your help very much. Dan

[Rd] issue with Rd2pdf and \Sexpr in Rd files

2012-03-14 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
Hi, The following command: R CMD Rd2pdf --no-preview --output=./tmp.pdf --title=test genefu-package.Rd run against this file: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/genefu/man/genefu-package.Rd (username: readonly; password: readonly) produces a very verbose error (see below)