Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-20 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:34 +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: > > "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:28:05 -0500 writes: >. > > >> > In reviewing the Green Book on the top of page 143, it shows an > example > >> > in which the RH

Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-20 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Marc" == Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:28:05 -0500 writes: . >> > In reviewing the Green Book on the top of page 143, it shows an example >> > in which the RHS of the assignment are the indices into the LHS object >> > which ar

Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 21:09 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > On 10/19/05, Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:13 +0100, Ted Harding wrote: > > > On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > > In the following the first element of xx should have > > > > been set t

Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-19 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 10/19/05, Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:13 +0100, Ted Harding wrote: > > On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > In the following the first element of xx should have > > > been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments? > > > > > >> xx <- c(NA,1) > > >> is

Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-19 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:13 +0100, Ted Harding wrote: > On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > In the following the first element of xx should have > > been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments? > > > >> xx <- c(NA,1) > >> is.na(xx) <- 0 > >> xx > > [1] NA 1 > >> R.version.string # Windows

Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-19 Thread Rich FitzJohn
Hi, It does seem to be working as advertised, but not particulary intuitively. From ?is.na The generic function 'is.na<-' sets elements to 'NA' In fact: xx <- c(NA, 1) is.na(xx) <- 2 xx [1] NA NA or is.na(xx) <- 5 [1] NA 1 NA NA NA Looks like this was introduced in 1.4.0; from NEWS: o

Re: [Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-19 Thread Ted Harding
On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > In the following the first element of xx should have > been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments? > >> xx <- c(NA,1) >> is.na(xx) <- 0 >> xx > [1] NA 1 >> R.version.string # Windows XP > [1] "R version 2.2.0, 2005-09-20" I wonder, has it ever worked? I

[Rd] is.na<- problem

2005-10-19 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
In the following the first element of xx should have been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments? > xx <- c(NA,1) > is.na(xx) <- 0 > xx [1] NA 1 > R.version.string # Windows XP [1] "R version 2.2.0, 2005-09-20" __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list htt