Thanks, I've committed the change.
Duncan Murdoch
On 6/17/2005 10:30 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> On 6/17/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 6/17/2005 8:58 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
>> > I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as
>> > clear as they could
On 6/17/05, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/17/2005 8:58 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> > I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as
> > clear as they could be.
> >
> > (1)
> >
> > freq: logical; if 'TRUE', the histogram graphic is a representation
> >
On 6/17/2005 8:58 AM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as
> clear as they could be.
>
> (1)
>
> freq: logical; if 'TRUE', the histogram graphic is a representation
> of frequencies, the 'counts' component of the result; if
>
I think there are a couple of things in ?hist that are not quite as
clear as they could be.
(1)
freq: logical; if 'TRUE', the histogram graphic is a representation
of frequencies, the 'counts' component of the result; if
'FALSE', _relative_ frequencies ("probabilities"),
