> Jan Gorecki
> on Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:49:11 +0530 writes:
> Thank you Gabriel,
> I agree that new behaviour makes much more sense. Just wanted to confirm
> before resolving compatibility of my unit tests.
> Best,
> Jan
Indeed, Gabe's explanation is right-on-spot:
Thank you Gabriel,
I agree that new behaviour makes much more sense. Just wanted to confirm
before resolving compatibility of my unit tests.
Best,
Jan
On Wed 18 Dec, 2019, 10:46 PM Gabriel Becker, wrote:
> Jan,
>
> That is an intentional change as you can see in the documentation for
> head/tail
Jan,
That is an intentional change as you can see in the documentation for
head/tail in R-devel. Last time I discussed it with Martin, this behavior
was desired and thus is unlikely to change unless "our" (ie his) mind does.
The hope is that the new behavior is actually what people would want (no
Hi R-devel community,
I am aware of changes in R-devel in head/tail methods but I was not
expecting that to be a breaking change.
# R 3.6.1
ar = array(1:27, c(3,3,3))
tail(ar, 1)
#[1] 27
The current output of R-devel is something that I would expect from a
tail(ar, c(1, Inf, Inf))
or
tail(ar,
