Re: [Rd] file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences

2012-05-10 Thread Joshua Wiley
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > This time it was a similar error on a different file.  Now fixed. Works wonderfully now, thank you so much, Duncan! > > Duncan Murdoch > > > On 08/05/2012 11:20 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Duncan Murdoch >>

Re: [Rd] file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences

2012-05-08 Thread Duncan Murdoch
This time it was a similar error on a different file. Now fixed. Duncan Murdoch On 08/05/2012 11:20 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote: On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 12-05-08 1:46 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision:

Re: [Rd] file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences

2012-05-08 Thread Joshua Wiley
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 12-05-08 1:46 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision: 59324 Last Changed >> Date: 2012-05-07) and tried to compile on a Win x64 system.  I am >> using Rtools version 2.15.0.1919.  The on

Re: [Rd] file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences

2012-05-08 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12-05-08 1:46 AM, Joshua Wiley wrote: Hi All, I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision: 59324 Last Changed Date: 2012-05-07) and tried to compile on a Win x64 system. I am using Rtools version 2.15.0.1919. The only change I make is changing MkRules.dist -> MkRules.local and setting

[Rd] file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences

2012-05-07 Thread Joshua Wiley
Hi All, I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision: 59324 Last Changed Date: 2012-05-07) and tried to compile on a Win x64 system. I am using Rtools version 2.15.0.1919. The only change I make is changing MkRules.dist -> MkRules.local and setting Multi=64 I have previously compiled unsuffe