Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-15 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nathan Coulter wrote: ---Original Message--- From: Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded Sent: 2008-10-14 12:59 On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nathan Coulter wrote:

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded ... It was pretty easy for me to get these line endings -- I created the file in GNU Emacs under Windows, and rsync'ed the package directory to a Ubuntu Linux machine. I went back and checked, and GNU Emacs under Ubuntu did show (DOS) in

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread William Dunlap
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Plate > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Sebastian P. Luque; Prof Brian Ripley > Subject: Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildigno

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread Tony Plate
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Sebastian P. Luque wrote: On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:10:41 -0600, Tony Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was trying, on a Linux system, to get a .Rbuildignore file to work. After far too long, I found the problem was the line endings in the .Rbuildi

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread Sebastian P. Luque
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:46:36 -0400, Nathan Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >> But to the point: how often do people get DOS-style files on a >> Unix-alike? You have to work pretty hard to do this, and there comes >> a point at which complicating R to workaround wrongl

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nathan Coulter wrote: Prof Brian Ripley wrote: But to the point: how often do people get DOS-style files on a Unix-alike? You have to work pretty hard to do this, and there comes a point at which complicating R to workaround wrongly encoded files is not worth the trouble.

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread Nathan Coulter
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > But to the point: how often do people get DOS-style files on a > Unix-alike? You have to work pretty hard to do this, and there comes a > point at which complicating R to workaround wrongly encoded files is not > worth the trouble. Let's see if anyone else reports havi

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-14 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Sebastian P. Luque wrote: On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:10:41 -0600, Tony Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was trying, on a Linux system, to get a .Rbuildignore file to work. After far too long, I found the problem was the line endings in the .Rbuildignore file -- I had origin

Re: [Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-13 Thread Sebastian P. Luque
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:10:41 -0600, Tony Plate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was trying, on a Linux system, to get a .Rbuildignore file to work. > After far too long, I found the problem was the line endings > in the .Rbuildignore file -- I had originally created it on a Windows > system, and em

[Rd] dos-style line endings in .Rbuildignore result in files not being excluded

2008-10-13 Thread Tony Plate
I was trying, on a Linux system, to get a .Rbuildignore file to work. After far too long, I found the problem was the line endings in the .Rbuildignore file -- I had originally created it on a Windows system, and emacs in Ubuntu was politely hiding that fact from me. The patterns didn't work