On Tue, 18 May 2010 10:22:03 +0200, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Tony Plate
>> on Mon, 17 May 2010 20:51:12 -0600 writes:
>
> > Jim, yes, I have dealt with that particular challenge that
list(...)
> > throws an error for a call like f(x,,,) where the empty args match
> > to
> Tony Plate
> on Mon, 17 May 2010 20:51:12 -0600 writes:
> Jim, yes, I have dealt with that particular challenge that list(...)
> throws an error for a call like f(x,,,) where the empty args match to a
> ... formal argument. Here's some fragments of code that I used t
Jim, yes, I have dealt with that particular challenge that list(...)
throws an error for a call like f(x,,,) where the empty args match to a
... formal argument. Here's some fragments of code that I used to cope
with this:
# to find the empty anon args, must work with the unevaluated dot
Apologies if I am not understanding something about how things are being
handled when using S4 methods, but I have been unable to find an answer to
my problem for some time now.
Briefly, I am associating the generic '[' with a class which I wrote
(here: myExample). The underlying back-end allows m
