On Saturday 16 December 2006 4:41 pm, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> Correction: the problems show on both platforms;
>
> one is in mgcv, gam(), an error in [[ <- -- pretty clearly linked to your
> changes but not reproducible when tried isolatedly
> interactively,
>
> the other one is a seg.fault "me
> "MM" == Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:31:21 +0100 writes:
> "Vladimir" == Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:03:21 -0500 writes:
Vladimir> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 6:01 am, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
> "Vladimir" == Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:03:21 -0500 writes:
Vladimir> On Wednesday 13 December 2006 6:01 am, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
>> - Vladimir, have you verified your 'take2' against recent versions
>> of R-devel?
Vlad
Robert Gentleman wrote:
> Hi,
>We had the "names" discussion and, AFAIR, the idea that someone might
> misinterpret the output as suggesting that one could index by number,
> seemed to kill it. A more reasonable argument against is that names<- is
> problematic.
>
> You can use $, [[ (wit
Hi,
We had the "names" discussion and, AFAIR, the idea that someone might
misinterpret the output as suggesting that one could index by number,
seemed to kill it. A more reasonable argument against is that names<- is
problematic.
You can use $, [[ (with character subscripts), and yes ls does
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 1:23 pm, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > 2. It would be nice to have true hashed arrays in R (i.e. O(1) access
> > times). So far I have used named lists for this, but they are O(n):
>
> new.env(hash=TRUE) with get/assign/exists works ok.
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> 2. It would be nice to have true hashed arrays in R (i.e. O(1) access
> times). So far I have used named lists for this, but they are O(n):
>
new.env(hash=TRUE) with get/assign/exists works ok. But I suspect its
just too easy to use named lists because it is e
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 6:01 am, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> - Vladimir, have you verified your 'take2' against recent versions
> of R-devel?
Yes.
>
> - If they still work, could you re-post them to R-devel, this
> time using a proper MIME type,
> i.e. most probably one of
> appl
r 12, 2006 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Rd] data frame subset patch, take 2
[SNIP]
> Note however that some of these changes are backward
> incompatible. I do hope that the changes gaining efficiency
> for such large data frames are worth some adaption of
> current/old R source code..
>
Martin Maechler wrote:
> [snip]
> Note however that some of these changes are backward
> incompatible. I do hope that the changes gaining efficiency
> for such large data frames are worth some adaption of
> current/old R source code..
>
> Feedback on this topic is very welcome!
Martin, my f
Hi,
I tried take 1, and it failed. I have been traveling (and with
Martin's changes also waiting for things to stabilize) before trying
take 2, probably later this week and I will send an email if it goes in.
Anyone wanting to try it and run R through check and check-all is
welcome to do so a
Hi Martin,
Conventions for optimizing away long, useless row name vector sound very
useful. Nice timings too!
I've noticed that before, and not been sure quite what to do. e.g. the
hdf5 module just gives up past a certain threshold as the long vectors
cause performance problems and HDF5 doesn
> "Marcus" == Marcus G Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:05:15 -0700 writes:
Marcus> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>> Here is the second iteration of data frame subset patch.
>> It now passes make check on both 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 (svn as
>> of a few days ago
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> Here is the second iteration of data frame subset patch.
> It now passes make check on both 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 (svn as of a few days ago).
> Same speedup as before.
>
Hi,
I was wondering if this patch would make it into the next release. I
don't see it in SVN, but it'
Hi Robert,
Here is the second iteration of data frame subset patch.
It now passes make check on both 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 (svn as of a few days ago).
Same speedup as before.
Changes:
* Introduced two new functions .subassign2 and .subassign that are
complimentary to .subset2 and .subset.
15 matches
Mail list logo
