On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, James Bullard wrote:
Hi All, I am confused about the following code. I thought that the problem
stemmed from lazy evaluation and the fact that 'i' is never evaluated within
the first lapply. However, I am then confused as to why it gets bound to the
final element of the la
Hi All, I am confused about the following code. I thought that the
problem stemmed from lazy evaluation and the fact that 'i' is never
evaluated within the first lapply. However, I am then confused as to
why it gets bound to the final element of the lapply. The environments
of the returned
