Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sys.setlocale(locale="C")
> [1] "C"
> > "Thomas O'Malley" < "Thomas Lumley"
> [1] TRUE
> > Sys.setlocale(locale="en_US.UTF8")
> [1]
> "LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF8;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=en_US.UTF8;LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF8;LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF8;LC_MESSAGES=C;LC_
Thomas Lumley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following caused a hard-to-diagnose problem for a user of the survey
> package. Presumably this is a strange Unicode thing, but is there a
> convenient reference for how the collation order is determined? I am
> surprised that adding the same cha
On Mar 17, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Thomas Lumley wrote:
> The following caused a hard-to-diagnose problem for a user of the
> survey package. Presumably this is a strange Unicode thing,
It is independent of the encoding:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_COLLATE=en_US R --vanilla -q "1//"<"10/"
[1] TRUE
> "
The following caused a hard-to-diagnose problem for a user of the survey
package. Presumably this is a strange Unicode thing, but is there a
convenient reference for how the collation order is determined? I am
surprised that adding the same character to the end of two strings of the
same leng
