On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Harris A. Jaffee wrote:
> Re: src/main/dotcode.c:do_dotCode()
>
> The value, if there is one, of a function called by .C or .Fortran is not
> captured, so one needs a wrapper. To avoid that, the user would have to
> declare that there is a value, specify its type, and supply
Well, fortran subroutines don't really have return values (versus
fortran functions, which do - as far as I know that's the only
difference between fortran subroutines and functions).
There is also a somewhat sticky matter, of C routines that returns
fairly complex types, like pointers, strings.
Re: src/main/dotcode.c:do_dotCode()
The value, if there is one, of a function called by .C or .Fortran is not
captured, so one needs a wrapper. To avoid that, the user would have to
declare that there is a value, specify its type, and supply an R variable
to hold the value. Presumably, all of th
