On Nov 9, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> On Friday, November 9, 2012, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> >>> The goal is to ascertain whether a copy of an object has been made.
> >>
> >> Then :
> >>
> >>?tracemem
> >>
> >> One demonstrat
On Friday, November 9, 2012, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> >>> The goal is to ascertain whether a copy of an object has been made.
> >>
> >> Then :
> >>
> >>?tracemem
> >>
> >> One demonstration of using both together is here :
> >>
> >>http
On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>> The goal is to ascertain whether a copy of an object has been made.
>>
>> Then :
>>
>>?tracemem
>>
>> One demonstration of using both together is here :
>>
>>http://stackoverflow.com/a/10312843/403310
>
> Note that tracemem detect
Thanks Matthew and Hadley; that is exactly what I was looking for, and them
some.
Regards,
Ben
>>/ The goal is to ascertain whether a copy of an object has been made.
/>/
/>/ Then :
/>/
/>/ ?tracemem
/>/
/>/ One demonstration of using both together is here :
/>/
/>/ http://stackoverflo
>> The goal is to ascertain whether a copy of an object has been made.
>
> Then :
>
> ?tracemem
>
> One demonstration of using both together is here :
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/a/10312843/403310
Note that tracemem detects duplications (in a technical R sense), not
copies - i.e.
x <- 1:
Benjamin Tyner gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to retrieve the 'named' field within the header (sxpinfo)
> of a object, without resorting to a debugger, external code, etc?
And much more than just NAMED :
.Internal(inspect(x))
> The goal is to ascertain whether a copy
Hello,
Is it possible to retrieve the 'named' field within the header (sxpinfo)
of a object, without resorting to a debugger, external code, etc? In
other words is there a built-in equivalent to the "getnamed" subroutine
described here:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/devel/07/09/4496.h
