Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360)

2006-11-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
t; From: "Duncan Murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:22 AM > Subject: Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360) > > >> On 11/13/2006 10:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >&g

Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360)

2006-11-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
eries of length 1. I'll take a look at the code. Duncan Murdoch > > > - Original Message - > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:22 AM

Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360) S-Plus Addendum

2006-11-13 Thread A.I. McLeod
it really doesn't matter at all how you handle this problem. Ian McLeod - Original Message - From: "Duncan Murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [Rd] bug i

Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360)

2006-11-13 Thread A.I. McLeod
T, it is the variance/variance = 0/0 which I said should best be 1 - Original Message - From: "Duncan Murdoch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360

Re: [Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360)

2006-11-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 11/13/2006 10:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Full_Name: Ian McLeod > Version: 2.3.1 > OS: Windows > Submission from: (NULL) (129.100.76.136) > > >> There is a simple bug in acf as shown below: >> >> z <- 1 >> acf(z,lag.max=1,plot=FALSE) >> Error in acf(z, lag.max = 1, plot = FALSE) : >>

[Rd] bug in acf (PR#9360)

2006-11-13 Thread aimcleod
Full_Name: Ian McLeod Version: 2.3.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (129.100.76.136) > There is a simple bug in acf as shown below: > > z <- 1 > acf(z,lag.max=1,plot=FALSE) > Error in acf(z, lag.max = 1, plot = FALSE) : >'lag.max' must be at least 1 > This is certainly a bug. Ther