Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Gilbert
Doug I do indeed have a Makevars file after all. Thanks for spelling out the interpretation of the warning message. Paul Douglas Bates wrote: > On 9/25/06, Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta). >> Writing R Extensions s

Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use

2006-09-25 Thread Douglas Bates
On 9/25/06, Paul Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta). > Writing R Extensions suggests I need a Makefile or Makevars in my > package, but that has not been the case previously. Is there now a > requirement that all packages ne

Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Gilbert
I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta). Writing R Extensions suggests I need a Makefile or Makevars in my package, but that has not been the case previously. Is there now a requirement that all packages need Makefiles or Makevars if there is fortran to be compiled

Re: [Rd] alpha, portable use

2006-09-20 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote: > When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting > > * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING > apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)' > > Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly

[Rd] alpha, portable use

2006-09-20 Thread Paul Gilbert
When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting * checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)' Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this before and didn't notice.) Paul Gilber