The all.equal was a side issue for me; I don't have strong opinions one way or
the other.
You are welcome to leave me out of the loop on that. (Or leave me on the cc,
whatever is
easiest).
I will update the survival package once the [.terms issues are addressed.
One debatable issues is
On 05/04/2019 9:03 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused.
data(esoph) # use a standard data set
t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph))
t1 <- terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph))
t1x <- (delete.response(
This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused.
data(esoph) # use a standard data set
t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph))
t1 <- terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph))
t1x <- (delete.response(t1))[-1]
> all.equal(t0x, t1x)
[1] TRUE
# the above is wrong, because
