> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:39:18 + (GMT) writes:
BDR> Martin,
BDR> I have some tests running over CRAN now (RUnit has also failed),
thank you, Brian, for the feedback
BDR> but have already noticed things like
>> swi
Martin,
I have some tests running over CRAN now (RUnit has also failed), but have
already noticed things like
> swiss[, 1] -> x
> names(x) <- rownames(swiss)
> all.equal(x, x[1:10])
[1] "Names: Lengths (47, 10) differ (string compare on first 10)"
[2] "Numeric: lengths (47, 10) differ"
which is
I'm "happy" to have found the first problem myself:
'Matrix' doesn't pass R CMD check anymore with the change I had
committed:
Basically because of this:
> all.equal(cbind(1:5), matrix(1:5, 5,1, dimnames=list(NULL,NULL)))
[1] "Attributes: < Names: Lengths (1, 2) differ (string compare on fi
I've now finally finalized my work on a subset of Andy's
propositions, and committed it to R-devel.
The current change doesn't show in our own checks and examples,
but may well in other people's package checks.
For this reason, I've also added a line to the
'USER-VISIBLE CHANGES' part of the NEWS
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
The attached patch against R 2.2.0 makes the following improvements to
the all.equal() function:
1. Check names! Stock R all.equal() (unlike S-Plus) ignores names
completely on some objects. I consider
