The software and manuals are not yet in readily accessible
form on CRAN based on the date of the feature and I would
prefer not to have to build it myself when any day now it will
be there automatically anyways.
Also, I was hoping to avoid a frustrating session of trial and error
when surely someo
On 17/09/2009 7:47 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I meant to write:
Rcmd INSTALL --build myPackage/
vs.
Rcmd INSTALL myPackage/
You, yourself, have mentioned the problem of linking help
pages on r-devel within the last few months:
More recently than that. This is the problem I was referring
I meant to write:
Rcmd INSTALL --build myPackage/
vs.
Rcmd INSTALL myPackage/
You, yourself, have mentioned the problem of linking help
pages on r-devel within the last few months:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/devel/09/05/1721.html
and now that this is all changing it would be helpful
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Does that mean that
Rcmd INSTALL --binary myPackage/
is still ok or should one use:
No, that has never worked. Please follow Simon's advice, and read the
manual.
Duncan Murdoch
Rcmd INSTALL myPackage/
without --binary and is this advice the same with a
Does that mean that
Rcmd INSTALL --binary myPackage/
is still ok or should one use:
Rcmd INSTALL myPackage/
without --binary and is this advice the same with and without Rtools?
Also, as there is potential confusion here could the combinations of flags
that are not recommended result in
On 17/09/2009 5:55 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 17/09/2009 4:40 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Maybe on other platforms but on Windows
help does not get linked properly with all
variations.
I think you are thinking of building binaries, not installing packages.
Generally the only variation
On 17/09/2009 4:40 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Maybe on other platforms but on Windows
help does not get linked properly with all
variations.
I think you are thinking of building binaries, not installing packages.
Generally the only variation we advise against is
R CMD build --binary
E
Maybe on other platforms but on Windows
help does not get linked properly with all
variations.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 16:09 , Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
>> Note that that is not currently the recommended way.
>>
>
> Now that would be a surpris
On Sep 17, 2009, at 16:09 , Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Note that that is not currently the recommended way.
Now that would be a surprise to me - to quote R-admin: 6.3.1: "R CMD
INSTALL works in Windows to install source packages if you have the
source-code package files".
Also, what co
Note that that is not currently the recommended way.
Also, what comes after INSTALL? The source .tar.gz name?
The pathname to the source directory?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:43 , Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Perhaps someone in the
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:43 , Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
Thanks. Perhaps someone in the core group can
still provide explicit information on how to install such
a package.
R CMD INSTALL
(see R --help and it has been *the* way to install packages for quite
a while so I'm not sure how more exp
Thanks. Perhaps someone in the core group can
still provide explicit information on how to install such
a package.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 17 September 2009 at 11:32, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> | Regarding this from this week:
> |
> | 2.10.0 PACKAGE INST
On 17 September 2009 at 11:32, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
| Regarding this from this week:
|
| 2.10.0 PACKAGE INSTALLATION (Windows)
| It is possible to install source packages without Rtools provided they
| have no compiled code and no configure.win or cleanup.win script.
|
| - what are the inst
Regarding this from this week:
2.10.0 PACKAGE INSTALLATION (Windows)
It is possible to install source packages without Rtools provided they
have no compiled code and no configure.win or cleanup.win script.
- what are the instructions to perform such a source install?
- I assume one still needs Mi
14 matches
Mail list logo
