Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, hadley wickham wrote:
>
> > Sorry, a better example is:
> >
> > > data.frame(a=1)[FALSE]
> > NULL data frame with 1 rows
> > > data.frame(a=1)[NULL]
> > NULL data frame with 1 rows
> >
> > vs
> >
> > > data.frame()[FALSE]
> >
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, hadley wickham wrote:
> Sorry, a better example is:
>
> > data.frame(a=1)[FALSE]
> NULL data frame with 1 rows
> > data.frame(a=1)[NULL]
> NULL data frame with 1 rows
>
> vs
>
> > data.frame()[FALSE]
> Warning in is.na(nm) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector)
> NULL da
Sorry, a better example is:
> data.frame(a=1)[FALSE]
NULL data frame with 1 rows
> data.frame(a=1)[NULL]
NULL data frame with 1 rows
vs
> data.frame()[FALSE]
Warning in is.na(nm) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector)
NULL data frame with 0 rows
> data.frame()[NULL]
Warning in is.na(nm) : is.
> data.frame()[]
NULL data frame with 0 rows
> data.frame()[FALSE]
Warning in is.na(nm) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector)
NULL data frame with 0 rows
> data.frame()[NULL]
Warning in is.na(nm) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector)
NULL data frame with 0 rows
Is this a bug? I wouldn't h