On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>> Dominick Samperi wrote a Rcpp.{hpp,cpp} class for
>> C++ to R interface that is used in RQuantLib. Dominick
>> was musing about releasing this stand-alone to CRAN
>> as well, but I don't think it has happened.
>
> It just
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Dominick Samperi wrote a Rcpp.{hpp,cpp} class for C++ to R interface that is
> used in RQuantLib. Dominick was musing about releasing this stand-alone to
> CRAN
> as well, but I don't think it has happened.
>
It just happened. I uploaded Rcpp to CRAN today. The packa
You might want to take a look at the Bioconductor package RBGL which
provides an R interface to the BGL which is C++ STL heavy, I believe.
+ seth
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Andrew Finley umn.edu> writes:
> I am in the process of writing an R extension in c++ and am using several
> STL containers (e.g., vector, map, multimap double>). I make sure to clear all these containers at the end of the
> .Call. Everything compiles and runs just fine, but I'm a bit worried
Using C++ will reduce portability of your code. Using C++'s STL (not R's
stl, so it is a good idea to spell out jargon) will reduce the
portability further.
R itself does not use C++, and although a C++ compiler is found, it is
only very mininally tested (and in particular its headers and libr
Hi All,
I am in the process of writing an R extension in c++ and am using several
STL containers (e.g., vector, map, multimap). I make sure to clear all these containers at the end of the
.Call. Everything compiles and runs just fine, but I'm a bit worried
since I haven't found any other packag
