Le 20/05/10 09:40, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit :
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for these clear guidelines.
Given these subtleties, would it make sense to have a "configure.R"
that would win over configure and configure.win, and have R invoking
it correctly, as bel
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for these clear guidelines.
Given these subtleties, would it make sense to have a "configure.R" that
would win over configure and configure.win, and have R invoking it correctly,
as below ?
Only if someone in R-core volunteers to
Hello,
Thank you for these clear guidelines.
Given these subtleties, would it make sense to have a "configure.R" that
would win over configure and configure.win, and have R invoking it
correctly, as below ?
Romain
Le 20/05/10 08:51, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit :
We have seen problems with a
We have seen problems with a number of packages which use R/Rscript to
run R code in configure or makefiles.
(a) You must give a full path: there need be no version of R in the
path, and if there is it might not be the version/build of R under
which package installation is being done. So the
