On 5 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had a bumpy ride with this one.
>
> Ruuid/src/Makefile.win refers to src/include, which is not in a
> binary distribution so cannot be installed from an installed version
> of R 2.2.1. (That's a bug report.)
Thanks for the report, this has been fixed in
I had a bumpy ride with this one.
Ruuid/src/Makefile.win refers to src/include, which is not in a binary
distribution so cannot be installed from an installed version of R 2.2.1.
(That's a bug report.)
graph throws an S4 signature error in R-devel.
After fixing those, it works with LazyLoad on
Thanks for the explaination of LazyLoad, that's very helpful.
On 1 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is no intention to withdraw SaveImage: yes. Rather, if
> lazy-loading is not doing a complete job, we could see if it could
> be improved.
It seems to me that LazyLoad does something di
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Seth Falcon wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Every usage of these on CRAN is unnecessary. If you want to save the
>> image, say so in the SaveImage field in DESCRIPTION (but why not
>> LazyLoad instead?). If you require methods, say so in Depends in
>> DESC
On 1 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Every usage of these on CRAN is unnecessary. If you want to save the
> image, say so in the SaveImage field in DESCRIPTION (but why not
> LazyLoad instead?). If you require methods, say so in Depends in
> DESCRIPTION.
I've looked over the packages in the
R-exts says
Both install.R and R_PROFILE.R should be viewed as experimental; the
mechanism to execute code before attaching or installing the package may
change in the near future. With the other facilities available as from R
2.0.0 they should be removed if possible.
Every usage of t
