On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:40 +0200, Friedrich Leisch wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:26 -0700,
> > Seth Falcon (SF) wrote:
>
> > "Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:07:26 -0700,
> Seth Falcon (SF) wrote:
> "Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> > ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skip
"Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2006/9/20, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping
>> > lines with % as the first character might be a viable compromise
>> > thoug
2006/9/20, Seth Falcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping
> > lines with % as the first character might be a viable compromise
> > though.
>
> +1. You could probably ignore any lines where the fir
Peter Dalgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ..not to mention TeX comments inside Sexpr (e.g. %*%...). Skipping
> lines with % as the first character might be a viable compromise
> though.
+1. You could probably ignore any lines where the first
non-whitespace char is '%'. But if that seems to r
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:20 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500,
> > > Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > On FC5, using:
> >
> > > Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829)
> >
> >
Friedrich Leisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500,
> > Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > On FC5, using:
>
> > Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829)
>
> > and today's
>
> > R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397)
>
> > w
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500,
> Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote:
> Hi all,
> On FC5, using:
> Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829)
> and today's
> R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397)
> with the following .Rnw file:
> \documentclass[10pt]{article}
> \be
Hi all,
On FC5, using:
Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829)
and today's
R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397)
with the following .Rnw file:
\documentclass[10pt]{article}
\begin{document}
This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1}
%% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 +
