Re: [Rd] Support for signing R packages with GPG

2016-11-01 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Martyn Plummer wrote: > Thanks Jeroen. The R Foundation has recently formed a working group to > look into package authentication. There are basically two models. One > is the GPG based model you describe; the other is to use X.509 as > implemented in the PKI packa

Re: [Rd] Support for signing R packages with GPG

2016-10-25 Thread Martyn Plummer
Thanks Jeroen. The R Foundation has recently formed a working group to look into package authentication. There are basically two models. One is the GPG based model you describe; the other is to use X.509 as implemented in the PKI package. It's not yet clear which way to go but we are thinking about

Re: [Rd] Support for signing R packages with GPG

2016-10-23 Thread Bob Rudis
I suspected/hoped this was one reason for the new pkg ;-) I'm *100% in support of this* and will help as much as I can. I can see if my org (Rapid7) would be willing to be a trusted peer (given my position it's prbly more like "we will be doing this" vs an ask). Sonatype may also be willing to be

[Rd] Support for signing R packages with GPG

2016-10-23 Thread Jeroen Ooms
I would like to propose adding experimental support for including a PGP signature in R source packages. This would make it possible to verify the identity of the package author and integrity of the package sources. There are two ways to implement this. Assuming GnuPG is on the PATH, the CMD build