On 1/30/25 22:07, Michael Chirico wrote:
Hello all,
The recent change (r87656) to make Rboolean map to type 'bool', not
'int', broke some tests & made me realize I've had totally the wrong
impression about what Rboolean actually is, and I suspect I'm not
alone.
Till now, I've assumed that lik
On 2/1/25 10:39, Ivan Krylov via R-devel wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:07:31 -0800
Michael Chirico wrote:
There are at least dozens of other cases on CRAN [2],[3].
Some of these involve casting an int to Rboolean. Best case, the int is
compared against NA_LOGICAL beforehand, avoiding any mi
On 02/02/2025 15:50, Ivan Krylov via R-devel wrote:
The good news is that without a C23-enabled compiler, the problem will
only happen to source files that #include . The bad news is
that such a source file will technically disagree with the rest of R
about the type of Rboolean, including the pro
The good news is that without a C23-enabled compiler, the problem will
only happen to source files that #include . The bad news is
that such a source file will technically disagree with the rest of R
about the type of Rboolean, including the prototypes of the API
functions that accept Rboolean:
#i
Hello all,
The recent change (r87656) to make Rboolean map to type 'bool', not
'int', broke some tests & made me realize I've had totally the wrong
impression about what Rboolean actually is, and I suspect I'm not
alone.
Till now, I've assumed that like Rbyte --> RAWSXP, Rboolean is the
_correct_
