Hi.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Seth Falcon wrote:
> On 3/22/10 3:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>
>>> "SF" == Seth Falcon
>>> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes:
>>
>> SF> On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>> >> Currently library() and attach() fa
On 3/22/10 3:57 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
"SF" == Seth Falcon
on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes:
SF> On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>> Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an
>> existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space,
>>
> "SF" == Seth Falcon
> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:47:17 -0700 writes:
SF> On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
>> Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an
>> existing '.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space,
>> unless it is exported. Since there shou
On 3/17/10 9:11 AM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an existing
'.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, unless it is exported.
Since there should be little interest in exporting '.conflicts.OK'
otherwise, one may argue that those methods should look fo
Currently library() and attach() fail to locate an existing
'.conflicts.OK' in a package wit name space, unless it is exported.
Since there should be little interest in exporting '.conflicts.OK'
otherwise, one may argue that those methods should look for
'.conflicts.OK' even if it is not exported.
