>On Sep 11, 2012, at 16:02 , Warnes, Gregory wrote:
>
>>
>> On 9/7/12 2:42 PM, "peter dalgaard" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 7, 2012, at 17:16 , Tim Hesterberg wrote:
>>>
I suggest adding a 'pivot' argument to qr.R, to obtain columns in the
same order as the original x, so that
a <- qr(
On Sep 11, 2012, at 16:02 , Warnes, Gregory wrote:
>
> On 9/7/12 2:42 PM, "peter dalgaard" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 7, 2012, at 17:16 , Tim Hesterberg wrote:
>>
>>> I suggest adding a 'pivot' argument to qr.R, to obtain columns in the
>>> same order as the original x, so that
>>> a <- qr(x)
>>>
On 9/7/12 2:42 PM, "peter dalgaard" wrote:
>
>On Sep 7, 2012, at 17:16 , Tim Hesterberg wrote:
>
>> I suggest adding a 'pivot' argument to qr.R, to obtain columns in the
>> same order as the original x, so that
>> a <- qr(x)
>> qr.Q(a) %*% qr.R(a, pivot=TRUE)
>> returns x.
>
>That would come s
On Sep 7, 2012, at 17:16 , Tim Hesterberg wrote:
> I suggest adding a 'pivot' argument to qr.R, to obtain columns in the
> same order as the original x, so that
> a <- qr(x)
> qr.Q(a) %*% qr.R(a, pivot=TRUE)
> returns x.
That would come spiraling down in flames the first time someone tried to
I suggest adding a 'pivot' argument to qr.R, to obtain columns in the
same order as the original x, so that
a <- qr(x)
qr.Q(a) %*% qr.R(a, pivot=TRUE)
returns x.
--
# File src/library/base/R/qr.R
qr.R <- function(qr, complete = FALSE, pivot = F
