On 02/07/2023 2:34 p.m., Sebastian Meyer wrote:
Am 02.07.23 um 18:01 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
This SO post: https://stackoverflow.com/q/76583828 describes a strange R
CMD check error. Depending on the contents of a comment in one of the
examples sections of a help page, an error like this could
Am 02.07.23 um 18:01 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
This SO post: https://stackoverflow.com/q/76583828 describes a strange R
CMD check error. Depending on the contents of a comment in one of the
examples sections of a help page, an error like this could be triggered:
> base::assign(".dptime", (pro
This SO post: https://stackoverflow.com/q/76583828 describes a strange R
CMD check error. Depending on the contents of a comment in one of the
examples sections of a help page, an error like this could be triggered:
> base::assign(".dptime", (proc.time() - get(".ptime", pos =
"CheckExEnv"))
Thanks, fixed in R-devel and R-patched.
The error happens in the child process when it is already exiting, after
it had delivered a result, so this should not cause any trouble in an
unpatched version of R (apart from showing that message). It is specific
to mccollect(wait=FALSE).
Best
Tomas
Dear All,
Since upgrading to 3.6.0, I've been getting a strange error messages
from the child process when using mcparallel/mccollect. Before filing a report
in the Bugzilla, I want to figure out whether I had been doing something wrong
all this time and R 3.6.0 has exposed it, or whether someth
Someone just sent me a data set that causes the lmekin function, part of
the kinship package, to fail. In chasing it down I get an error I have
never seen before.
fit <- lmekin(icam1 ~ factor(center) + age + factor(sex),
random= ~1|iid, data=chaidata, varlist=kmat)
Error in Y - fitt
Brian,
Thank you. This explains why it works in Splus: PROTECT is a null macro
there, so I wouldn't have caught the miscount.
Terry
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
This indicates that your PROTECTs and UNPROTECTs are out of balance (by
one, looking at the numbers) in the .Call (which I assume is to your own
code?).
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Terry Therneau wrote:
I'm testing out some changes to survreg and got the following output, the
likes of which I've neve
I'm testing out some changes to survreg and got the following output, the
likes of which I've never seen before:
--
R version 2.7.1 (2008-06-23)
Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R
Generator Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium) Hi,
I'm the mannova package maintainer. We used La.svd(X, method="dgesvd") in
maanova package before. After R-2.3.0, the old La.svd() method was deprecated
for option method="dgesvd". I changed maanova code correspondingly, which will
call method="d
I've also seen this checking randomForest. It looks like the result of
memory corruption, so please try with valgrind and/or using gctorture.
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Liaw, Andy wrote:
> Dear R-devel,
>
> Kurt had alerted me to the problem that the randomForest package that I
> maintain has been fa
Dear R-devel,
Kurt had alerted me to the problem that the randomForest package that I
maintain has been failing checks in R-devel. However, I just can't see
why or where it's failing. I'd very much appreciate any pointer.
The failure occur when running the example code in varImpPlot.Rd:
> varI
12 matches
Mail list logo