Re: [Rd] Small typo in Writing R Extensions

On 2/8/23 21:33, Davis Vaughan via R-devel wrote: Hi all, Writing R Extensions describes `R_NewEnv()` as: ``` At times it may also be useful to create a new environment frame in C code. R_NewEnv is a C version of the R function new.env: SEXP R_NewEnv(SEXP enclos, int hash, ins size) ``` The

[Rd] Small typo in Writing R Extensions

Hi all, Writing R Extensions describes `R_NewEnv()` as: ``` At times it may also be useful to create a new environment frame in C code. R_NewEnv is a C version of the R function new.env: SEXP R_NewEnv(SEXP enclos, int hash, ins size) ``` There is a typo here where `ins size` should be `int size

Re: [Rd] Small typo in 'Writing R extensions'

I presume you mean in HTML? The PDF versions have the correct numbering. Compare the two versions on http://cran.r-project.org/manuals.html. That's not a 'typo' but a makeinfo problem. There's a similar one in the TOC of R-admin.texi where the appendices are numbered not lettered in the ToC (b

[Rd] Small typo in 'Writing R extensions'

Hello, I have just noticed the Table of Contents of 'Writing R extensions' is wrongly numbered, as it gives, for example, 5. Debugging, when that is section 4, as the acknowledgements section is numbered in the ToC only. Regards, Iago __ R-devel@r-