On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Rob Goedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fritz,
>
> Thanks a lot for your very clear answer (it provided me with the needed
> context for the decisions)!
>
> I'll continue to investigate what can be done on a small(er) scale with R,
> the
> already available R/p
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:05:56 -0700,
> Rob Goedman (RG) wrote:
> Mike,
> I'm also surprised so few reactions have been forthcoming. I saw
> William's email shortly after Jan's email about Sage.
There is a priovate mailing list for all R Google SoC mentors and
parts were discussed
Mike,
I'm also surprised so few reactions have been forthcoming. I saw
William's email shortly after Jan's email about Sage.
Having been involved in the Ryacas project (R to Yacas - Yet Another
Computer Algebra System - with Gabor, Soren and Ayal), I believe in
the tremendous benefits of s
I would like to re-emphasize the above points that William makes.
Both projects could benefit a lot from working with each other. A
fair number of people, including Persi Diaconis and Susan Holmes, have
had enthusiastic responses when I mentioned that R was being included
with Sage.
This is a goo
Hi R-Devel,
The Sage project (http://www.sagemath.org) has been working extremely
hard for several
years to create a viable free open source alternative to Maple,
Matlab, Mathematica, and
Magma. Numerous users have requested statistical functionality.
Though Sage includes
scipy and numpy, which ha
