On 04.06.2011, at 15:41, Martin Morgan wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 03:07 AM, soeren.vo...@uzh.ch wrote:
>
>> Hello, an S4 class "Foo" is defined with a setter, $. For several reasons,
>> the setter calls a function, .foo.update(). However, bypassing the argument
>> names of the setter does not work.
On 06/04/2011 03:07 AM, soeren.vo...@uzh.ch wrote:
Hello, an S4 class "Foo" is defined with a setter, $. For several reasons, the
setter calls a function, .foo.update(). However, bypassing the argument names of the
setter does not work. Question 1: Why not and how can I fix this? Question 2: Wh
Hello, an S4 class "Foo" is defined with a setter, $. For several reasons, the
setter calls a function, .foo.update(). However, bypassing the argument names
of the setter does not work. Question 1: Why not and how can I fix this?
Question 2: What is the way to define either the function or the s
