On 29/08/2011 8:20 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> So doesn't that break packages that use S3 but don't have a NAMESPACE?
>
> Maybe, but since the methods are exported as functions they are also found
> for method dispatch and imported, if another package imports from the
> Namspace. The problem
On 29.08.2011 14:20, Hadley Wickham wrote:
So doesn't that break packages that use S3 but don't have a NAMESPACE?
Maybe, but since the methods are exported as functions they are also found
for method dispatch and imported, if another package imports from the
Namspace. The problem I see is wha
>> So doesn't that break packages that use S3 but don't have a NAMESPACE?
>
> Maybe, but since the methods are exported as functions they are also found
> for method dispatch and imported, if another package imports from the
> Namspace. The problem I see is what happens if method dispatch is done o
On 27.08.2011 20:02, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Are there any plans for figuring out potential S3 methods and declaring
them
with S3method() in the automatic default NAMESPACE?
There are no safe ways to do that.
So doesn't that break packages that use S3 but don't have a NAMESPACE?
Maybe, but
>> Are there any plans for figuring out potential S3 methods and declaring
>> them
>> with S3method() in the automatic default NAMESPACE?
>
> There are no safe ways to do that.
So doesn't that break packages that use S3 but don't have a NAMESPACE?
Hadley
--
Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family
On 26.08.2011 23:47, Michael Lawrence wrote:
Hi guys,
Are there any plans for figuring out potential S3 methods and declaring them
with S3method() in the automatic default NAMESPACE?
There are no safe ways to do that.
Uwe
Thanks,
Michael
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
Hi guys,
Are there any plans for figuring out potential S3 methods and declaring them
with S3method() in the automatic default NAMESPACE?
Thanks,
Michael
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.e
