On Thu, 15 May 2008, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 06:04:51 -, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Last question: Will I need to UNPROTECT_PTR all references held, or will
the call to Rf_endEmbeddedR also free protected references?
What is a 'reference' here?
Rig
On Thu, 15 May 2008 06:04:51 -, Prof Brian Ripley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last question: Will I need to UNPROTECT_PTR all references held, or
will the call to Rf_endEmbeddedR also free protected references?
What is a 'reference' here?
Right, my question was imprecise. I meant 'SEXP
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 07:15:15 +0200, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What I would like to know, and I have not yet found an answer in the
documentation: is there a way to 'reset' the interpreter to bring it to
the state that it was direct
On Thu, 15 May 2008 07:15:15 +0200, Prof Brian Ripley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I would like to know, and I have not yet found an answer in the
documentation: is there a way to 'reset' the interpreter to bring it to
the state that it was directly after the call of the initialization
r
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
Dear List,
I am learning how to use the R.dll unter Windows to embed an R interpreter
into another programming language.
What I would like to know, and I have not yet found an answer in the
documentation: is there a way to 'reset' the interpreter
Dear List,
I am learning how to use the R.dll unter Windows to embed an R interpreter
into another programming language.
What I would like to know, and I have not yet found an answer in the
documentation: is there a way to 'reset' the interpreter to bring it to
the state that it was direc
