My guess is that the distinction here is between `@<-` and `slot<-`.
The first, but not the second, has been converted to a primitive (the second
has an optional argument, making it more of a nuisance to implement.)
Previously they did the same check; after the revision of `@<-` they did not;
a
Hello Martin,
Below is a reduced version of our code that doesn't produce an error in
r61643 but does in 2.15.2.
Thanks,
-- François
setClass("phylo4",
representation(edge="matrix",
annote="list"),
prototype = list(edge = matrix(nrow = 0, ncol = 2
> François Michonneau
> on Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:34:36 -0500 writes:
> Hello all,
> In one of the packages (phylobase) I'm contributing to, we define a class
> as follows:
> setClass("phylo4",
> representation(edge = "matrix",
> edge.length
Thanks John.
Just to clarify further my previous message, the other slots were returning
error messages when provided with objects of the incorrect class, but not
the slot that was supposed to be a list.
Cheers,
-- François
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:54 PM, John Chambers wrote:
> Thank
Thanks. No need for a complicated example actually:
> C1 <- setClass("C1", slots = c(x = "numeric"))
> c1 <- C1()
> c1@x <- "Hello"
> validObject(c1)
Error in validObject(c1) :
invalid class "C1" object: invalid object for slot "x" in class "C1": got
class "character", should be or extend cla
Hello all,
In one of the packages (phylobase) I'm contributing to, we define a class
as follows:
setClass("phylo4",
representation(edge = "matrix",
edge.length = "numeric",
label = "character",
edge.label = "charac
