Hi,
On 11-07-04 05:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
There was an R-core meeting the week before last, and various planned
changes will appear in R-devel over the next few weeks.
These are changes planned for R 2.14.0 scheduled for Oct 31. As we are
sick of people referring to R-devel as '2.14' o
On 07/07/2011 3:38 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Thank you Duncan for those reassurances. I still have a couple of questions, as
below, but there was definitely some good news for me in your replies:
- IIUC , the "source" attribute will still be available for everything,
provided R_KEE
evel was that the distro would be byte-compiled already.
Thanks
Mark Bravington
CSIRO CMIS
Marine Lab
Hobart
Australia
From: Duncan Murdoch [murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 July 2011 21:43
To: Stephan Wahlbrink
Cc: tobias.verb...@openanalytics.eu; Bravingto
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
[aggressive trimming]
>>> It seems like something a front end could do to make assignInNamespace
>>> easier to use to make working with namespaces easier.
>>
>> Indeed I find this cha
On Jul 6, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
>> On 11-07-06 9:25 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
>>> wrote:
In the near future all packages will have a na
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 11-07-06 9:25 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In the near future all packages will have a name space. If the sources
>>> do
>>> not contain one, a default NAMESPAC
On 11-07-06 9:25 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
In the near future all packages will have a name space. If the sources do
not contain one, a default NAMESPACE file will be added. This again will
simplify the descriptions and also a lot
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> In the near future all packages will have a name space. If the sources do
> not contain one, a default NAMESPACE file will be added. This again will
> simplify the descriptions and also a lot of internal code. Maintainers of
> packages w
On 11-07-06 3:46 AM, Stephan Wahlbrink wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote [2011-07-05 17:21]:
On 05/07/2011 11:20 AM, Stephan Wahlbrink wrote:
Dear developers,
Duncan Murdoch wrote [2011-07-05 15:25]:
On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
L.S.
On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.a
Duncan Murdoch wrote [2011-07-05 17:21]:
On 05/07/2011 11:20 AM, Stephan Wahlbrink wrote:
Dear developers,
Duncan Murdoch wrote [2011-07-05 15:25]:
> On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>> L.S.
>>
>> On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
>> > I may have misunderstood,
On 05/07/2011 1:45 PM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
On 07/05/2011 04:21 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 10:17 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>> Dear Duncan,
>>
>> On 07/05/2011 03:25 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> > On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>> >> L.S.
>> >>
>> >> On 07/0
On Jul 5, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 04:21 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 05/07/2011 10:17 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>>> Dear Duncan,
>>>
>>> On 07/05/2011 03:25 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>> > On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>>> >> L.S.
>>> >>
>>> >> O
On 07/05/2011 04:21 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 05/07/2011 10:17 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
Dear Duncan,
On 07/05/2011 03:25 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>> L.S.
>>
>> On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
>> > I may have misundersto
Dear developers,
Duncan Murdoch wrote [2011-07-05 15:25]:
On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
L.S.
On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
> I may have misunderstood, but:
>
> Please could we have an optional installation that does not*not*
byte-compile base and recomm
On 05/07/2011 11:20 AM, Stephan Wahlbrink wrote:
Dear developers,
Duncan Murdoch wrote [2011-07-05 15:25]:
> On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>> L.S.
>>
>> On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
>> > I may have misunderstood, but:
>> >
>> > Please could we ha
On 05/07/2011 10:17 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
Dear Duncan,
On 07/05/2011 03:25 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
>> L.S.
>>
>> On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
>> > I may have misunderstood, but:
>> >
>> > Please could we have
Dear Duncan,
On 07/05/2011 03:25 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
L.S.
On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
> I may have misunderstood, but:
>
> Please could we have an optional installation that does not*not*
byte-compile base and recom
On 05/07/2011 6:52 AM, Tobias Verbeke wrote:
L.S.
On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
> I may have misunderstood, but:
>
> Please could we have an optional installation that does not*not*
byte-compile base and recommended?
>
> Reason: it's not possible to debug byte-comp
L.S.
On 07/05/2011 02:16 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I may have misunderstood, but:
Please could we have an optional installation that does not*not* byte-compile
base and recommended?
Reason: it's not possible to debug byte-compiled code-- at least not with the
'debug' package, whic
I may have misunderstood, but:
Please could we have an optional installation that does not *not* byte-compile
base and recommended?
Reason: it's not possible to debug byte-compiled code-- at least not with the
'debug' package, which is quite widely used. I quite often end up using
'mtrace' on
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Martin Morgan wrote:
On 07/04/2011 05:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
There was an R-core meeting the week before last, and various planned
changes will appear in R-devel over the next few weeks.
These are changes planned for R 2.14.0 scheduled for Oct 31. As we are
sick of
On 07/04/2011 05:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
There was an R-core meeting the week before last, and various planned
changes will appear in R-devel over the next few weeks.
These are changes planned for R 2.14.0 scheduled for Oct 31. As we are
sick of people referring to R-devel as '2.14' or '
There was an R-core meeting the week before last, and various planned
changes will appear in R-devel over the next few weeks.
These are changes planned for R 2.14.0 scheduled for Oct 31. As we
are sick of people referring to R-devel as '2.14' or '2.14.0', that
version number will not be used
23 matches
Mail list logo
