On 9/16/2005 4:16 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> There are two instances of this. If I add 'go' to both it works for me.
> I guess you only had the first one (the second is used here).
Yes, that's it. Thanks!
Duncan Murdoch
>
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
>> On 9/15/2005 7:5
There are two instances of this. If I add 'go' to both it works for me.
I guess you only had the first one (the second is used here).
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 9/15/2005 7:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> First of all, thanks to those who've set up R to work so smoothly w
On 16-Sep-05 Ted Harding wrote:
> On 16-Sep-05 Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> Yes, this is the tex that gets output:
>>
>> \code{mlazy( <{}{}>, <>, <>)}
>>
>> This seems to happen in Rdconv.pm, around here:
>>
>> ## avoid conversion to guillemots
>> $c =~ s/<> $c =~ s/>>/>\{\}>/;
>>
>>
On 16-Sep-05 Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 9/15/2005 7:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> First of all, thanks to those who've set up R to work so smoothly with
>> Miktex-- even a total Latex bunny like me got it to work instantly, so
>> that for the first time I'm able to run my Rd files through the
On 9/15/2005 7:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First of all, thanks to those who've set up R to work so smoothly with
> Miktex-- even a total Latex bunny like me got it to work instantly, so
> that for the first time I'm able to run my Rd files through the Latex
> side of RCMD CHECK.
>
> Now the
First of all, thanks to those who've set up R to work so smoothly with
Miktex-- even a total Latex bunny like me got it to work instantly, so
that for the first time I'm able to run my Rd files through the Latex
side of RCMD CHECK.
Now the question/buglet. One of my Rd files contains the following
