Re: [Rd] R.exp file for building packages

2006-11-14 Thread Agner Fog
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >You may if you prefer use Visual C++ to make the DLLs (unless they use >Fortran source!). First build the import library Rdll.lib by > > make R.exp > lib /def:R.exp /out:Rdll.lib > > > This requires building R from the source. There are a lot of things

Re: [Rd] R.exp file for building packages

2006-11-13 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Christopher G. Green (W) wrote: > I am trying to port some C code from S-Plus (7.0.6) to R (2.4.0) under > Windows XP SP2. I use Visual C++ 6.0 to build my library for S-Plus, so I'd > like to stick with that set up, if possible. According to the > README.packages file, I need

[Rd] R.exp file for building packages

2006-11-13 Thread Christopher G. Green \(W\)
I am trying to port some C code from S-Plus (7.0.6) to R (2.4.0) under Windows XP SP2. I use Visual C++ 6.0 to build my library for S-Plus, so I'd like to stick with that set up, if possible. According to the README.packages file, I need the file R.exp (containing functions exported from R.dll, I'm